Assessing the gap between Learning Investment and Business Impact
Most organisations have clear visibility on financial audit and operational risk, yet lack visibility on the ROI of their Learning & Development spend. When learning fails to translate into workplace behaviour, it becomes a sunk cost rather than a growth lever.
This scorecard evaluates your current approach against five dimensions that determine whether training produces measurable performance improvement—or disappears into the knowing-applying gap.
What does your learning data actually tell you—that people showed up, or that they can do the job?
Research consistently shows that completion rates and satisfaction scores have no statistical correlation with on-the-job performance improvement. Yet these remain the primary metrics in most L&D reporting.
02
Learning Continuity (Event vs. Journey)
After formal training ends, what structured support do your learners receive to apply what they learned?
Research shows that without reinforcement, learners can lose 50-70% of new information within the first day. Yet most learning interventions end when the training event ends, leaving application to chance.
03
Systems Architecture (Content Storage vs. Performance Enablement)
Is your learning technology designed to host courses, or to guide people through the full process of turning knowledge into capability?
Traditional LMS platforms were built as content libraries with compliance tracking. They excel at storing courses and recording completions. They were not designed to manage the diverse activities—practice, feedback, coaching, workplace tasks—that turn knowledge into performance.
04
Learning in the Workflow (Organised vs. Scattered)
When employees face a challenge or knowledge gap during their work, how easily can they access the right learning resources without leaving their workflow?
Real learning in the workflow means employees can pause work, in situ, and quickly navigate to content, activities, or guidance that helps them overcome a specific challenge. It also means the system can proactively prompt learners to take action. When resources are scattered across systems or buried in folder structures, that connection between work and learning breaks.
05
Applying Learning (Structured Practice vs. Hope)
Do your learners have explicit, guided opportunities to practise new skills before they need to use them under real pressure?
Skill development requires practice with feedback. Yet most training programmes teach concepts and then expect learners to figure out application themselves. Without structured practice opportunities, the transfer from "I understand" to "I can do" rarely happens.
Button becomes active after answering all 5 questions
0 / 15
Your Priority Actions
What Next?
This assessment identifies where your current approach supports or undermines learning transfer. Your context, constraints, and priorities determine the right path forward.